Windland v. Commissioner of Social Security, No. 2:2024cv00694 - Document 12 (S.D. Ohio 2024)

Court Description: DECISION AND ENTRY - IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. The parties' Joint Motion to Remand (Doc. No. 11 ) is ACCEPTED; 2. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter Judgment in Plaintiff's favor under Fed. R. Civ. P. 58; 3. This matter is REMA NDED to the Social Security Administration, pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), for further consideration consistent with this Decision and Entry and the parties Motion; and 4. The case is terminated on the docket of this Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Caroline H. Gentry on 5/3/2024. (srb)

Download PDF
Windland v. Commissioner of Social Security Doc. 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION (COLUMBUS) JOSEPH W., Plaintiff, vs. COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant. : Case No. 2:24-cv-00694 : : Magistrate Judge Caroline H. Gentry : (by full consent of the parties) : : : : : : DECISION AND ENTRY This Social Security case is presently before the Court on the parties’ Joint Motion to Remand. (Doc. No. 11.) The parties agree that this Court should enter a judgment reversing the Commissioner’s decision pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), with remand of the cause to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings. The parties further agree that upon remand, the Appeals Council will vacate all findings in the Administrative Law Judge’s decision, and the Commissioner will develop the administrative record as necessary to determine whether Plaintiff is disabled within the meaning of the Social Security Act, hold a new hearing, and then issue a new decision. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. The parties’ Joint Motion to Remand (Doc. No. 11) is ACCEPTED; 2. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter Judgment in Plaintiff’s favor under Fed. R. Civ. P. 58; Dockets.Justia.com 3. This matter is REMANDED to the Social Security Administration, pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), for further consideration consistent with this Decision and Entry and the parties’ Motion; and 4. The case is terminated on the docket of this Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/ Caroline H. Gentry Caroline H. Gentry United States Magistrate Judge 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.