Franklin v. Streeval et al, No. 7:2023cv00771 - Document 3 (W.D. Va. 2024)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Thomas T. Cullen on 5/3/2024. (Opinion mailed to Pro Se Party/Parties via US Mail)(tvt)

Download PDF
Franklin v. Streeval et al Doc. 3 $-&3,h4 0''*$& 6 4 %*45 $0635 "5 30"/0,& 7" '*-&% IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ROANOKE DIVISION May 03, 2024 -"63" " "645*/ $-&3, #: s/5. 5BZMPS %&165: $-&3, JONATHAN R. FRANKLIN, ) ) Petitioner, ) Civil Action No. 7:23cv00771 ) v. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION ) J.C. STREEVAL, et al., ) By: Hon. Thomas T. Cullen ) United States District Judge Respondents. ) ________________________________________________________________________ By order entered April 8, 2024, the court conditionally filed Petitioner Jonathan R. Franklin’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. In the conditional filing order, the court directed Franklin to either pay the filing fee or sign and return a consent to fee form within 21 days. (See ECF No. 2.) The court advised Franklin that failure to comply with the court’s order within 21 days may result in the dismissal of the action without prejudice. (Id.) To date, Franklin has not responded to the court’s order. Because the time to respond has passed and Franklin has failed to comply with the court’s order, the court will dismiss this action without prejudice. The Clerk shall send a copy of this Memorandum Opinion and the accompanying Order to Petitioner. ENTERED this 3rd day of May, 2024. /s/ Thomas T. Cullen________________ HON. THOMAS T. CULLEN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.