Starbucks Corporation v. McKinney
Docket No.
23-367
Granted:
January 12, 2024
Argued:
April 23, 2024
Materials
Argued. For petitioner: Lisa S. Blatt, Washington, D. C. For respondent: Austin Raynor, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. |
Reply of Starbucks Corporation submitted. |
Reply of petitioner Starbucks Corporation filed. (Distributed) |
Amicus brief of Labor and Employment Law Professors submitted. |
Amicus brief of Constitutional Accountability Center submitted. |
Brief amici curiae of Remedies Scholars filed. (Distributed) |
Amicus brief of Caprice L. Roberts and Doug Rendleman submitted. |
Brief amici curiae of Labor and Employment Law Professors filed. (Distributed) |
Brief amicus curiae of Constitutional Accountability Center filed. (Distributed) |
Amicus brief of Starbucks Workers submitted. |
Amicus brief of American Federation of Labor-Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) submitted. |
Amicus brief of Service Employees International Union (SEIU) submitted. |
Brief amici curiae of Starbucks Workers filed. (Distributed) |
Brief amici curiae of American Federation of Labor-Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) filed. (Distributed) |
Brief amicus curiae of Service Employees International Union (SEIU) filed. (Distributed) |
CIRCULATED |
Brief of Kathleen McKinney, Regional Director of Region 15 of the National Labor Relations Board, for and on Behalf of the National Labor Relations Board submitted. |
Brief of respondent Kathleen McKinney, Regional Director of Region 15 of the National Labor Relations Board, for and on Behalf of the National Labor Relations Board filed. |
Amicus brief of State of Tennessee and Twenty Other States submitted. |
Amicus brief of National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation submitted. |
Amicus brief of The Chamber of Commerce of the United States and National Association of Manufacturers submitted. |
Amicus brief of New Civil Liberties Alliance submitted. |
Brief amici curiae of Coalition for a Democratic Workplace, et al. filed. |
Amicus brief of Coalition for a Democratic Workplace; Associated Builders and Contractors; HR Policy Association; National Association of Wholesaler-Distributors; and National Retail Federation submitted. |
Amicus brief of Buckeye Institute submitted. |
Brief amicus curiae of New Civil Liberties Alliance filed. |
Brief amici curiae of State of Tennessee and Twenty Other States filed. |
Brief amicus curiae of Buckeye Institute filed. |
Brief amici curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. filed. |
Brief amicus curiae of National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation filed. |
Brief amici curiae of The Chamber of Commerce of the United States and National Association of America, et al. filed. |
Amicus brief of Washington Legal Foundation submitted. |
Brief amicus curiae of Washington Legal Foundation filed. |
Record received from the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. The record is electronic and is available on PACER. |
Record requested from the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. |
Brief of Starbucks Corporation submitted. |
Brief of petitioner Starbucks Corporation filed. |
Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioner GRANTED. |
SET FOR ARGUMENT on Tuesday, April 23, 2024. |
Motion of Starbucks Corporation to dispense with joint appendix submitted. |
Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioner Starbucks Corporation. |
Petition GRANTED. |
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/12/2024. |
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/5/2024. |
Reply of petitioner Starbucks Corporation filed. (Distributed) |
Brief of respondent M. Kathleen McKinney, Regional Director of Region 15 of the National Labor Relations Board, for and on Behalf of the National Labor Relations Board in opposition filed. |
Brief amici curiae of The Chamber of Commerce of the United States, et al. filed. |
Brief amicus curiae of New Civil Liberties Alliance filed. |
Brief amici curiae of Coalition for a Democratic Workplace, et al. filed. |
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 6, 2023. |
Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 6, 2023 to December 6, 2023, submitted to The Clerk. |
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 6, 2023) |
Search This Case