Heidel v. Wallace & Tiernan
Annotate this Case21 N.J. 335 (1956)
122 A.2d 180
JOHN HEIDEL, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. WALLACE & TIERNAN, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued March 26, 1956.
Decided April 23, 1956.
Mr. Isidor Kalisch argued the cause for the appellant.
Mr. Solomon Golat argued the cause for the respondent (Messrs. Talisman & Golat, attorneys).
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Conlon in the court below.
For affirmance Chief Justice VANDERBILT, and Justices HEHER, OLIPHANT, WACHENFELD, BURLING, JACOBS and BRENNAN 7.
For reversal None.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
