State v. Bicanich
Annotate this Case66 N.J. 557 (1975)
334 A.2d 17
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. JOHN BICANICH, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued February 18, 1975.
Decided February 26, 1975.
Mr. Julian Wilsey, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for appellant (Mr. William F. Hyland, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney).
*558 Mr. Daniel J. Carluccio argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Citta, Gasser, Carluccio and Holzapfel, attorneys).
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by the Appellate Division, 132 N.J. Super. 393.
For affirmance Chief Justice HUGHES, Justices JACOBS, MOUNTAIN, SULLIVAN, PASHMAN and CLIFFORD and Judge CONFORD 7.
For reversal None.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
