State v. Heintz (consolidated w/ 20230382, 20230383, & 20230385)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2024 ND 82 State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Kyle Martin Heintz, Defendant and Appellant Nos. 20230382–20230385 Appeals from the District Court of Grand Forks County, Northeast Central Judicial District, the Honorable Donald Hager, Judge. AFFIRMED. Per Curiam. Kathryn R. Jund, Assistant State’s Attorney, and Victoria J.M. Christian, under the Rule on Limited Practice of Law by Law Students, Grand Forks, N.D., for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief. Kevin McCabe, Dickinson, N.D., for defendant and appellant; submitted on brief. State v. Heintz Nos. 20230382–20230385 Per Curiam. [¶1] Kyle Martin Heintz appeals from orders for revocation of probation entered in four criminal cases. He argues the district court abused its discretion by denying his motion to continue the sentencing portion of his revocation proceedings. After review of the record, we conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion by denying the motion to continue. We summarily affirm the orders for revocation of probation under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4). [¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte Douglas A. Bahr 1

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.